Okay here's the deal ... marriage is for reproduction , order , stability and heirs
Why am I telling you this ? Because in the Ancient World there were some homosexuals in the Mediterranean , Middle East and even Japan and here's this ... some sectors of the Patriarchy was created by their influence
Basically it goes like this ... look at the energy of M/M
M/M is gay and therefore ONLY male energy
Male is one layer and then another layer of M basically creates a pool of male energy ... a strong thick male energy pool
Think of it this way
M/F ( heterosexuality ) is neutral or balanced because there is an equal amount of male and female energy
F/F leans towards the female due to a pool of female energy and is flexible in it's sexuality
M/M leans towards the male due to a pool of male energy and is rigid in it's sexuality
That explains why F/F ( Lesbians ) are far more sexually fluid
Judaism and Christianity for example were born in the ancient world and therefore came in contact with homosexuals ... homosexuals , whether they like it or not , have a rigid sexuality orientation because the gay makeup ( M/M ) gives a lot of rigidity due to the lack of flexible female energy
Let's recap ... M/F is neutral and balanced and you can imagine heterosexuals wearing white clothes
Now M/M is not wearing any light clothes ... instead since it only comes in contact with males the clothes are over aggressive like dark blue ( navy blue ) or black ... F/F is probably wearing light pink or light violent ( only female energy )
Perhaps Jews and Christians , since they worship what is good ( aka '' balanced '' ) and are '' children of light '' saw the aggressive gays and quite possibly rejected male homosexuality first ( and then later on started to dislike everything and just stayed within the reproductive institution meaning the neutral M/F )
Cultures that were influenced by homosexuality were on occasion overly aggressive and used children ( and even tranvestites ) in their sexual preference over women ( which were in marriage and for reproduction ) . This occured basically because gay energy is oversexed and maleish ( lots and lots of penis - remember no female energy ) and therefore direction ( sexual ) went way off ... promiscuity also arose then .
I know that talk of sexual use of boys , children , catamites and tranvestites is offensive but to some male homosexuals ( those whom are anywhere near the 100 % gay spectrum ) the closer to the male the better ... the farther away ( 95 % of most females due to their biology , conservative women due to their character , moderate feminine women due to etiquette , etc ) the less he is interested
Basically that a '' half breed '' ( boy , catamite , tranvestite ) is more palatable to a gay man that is near the 100 % gay spectrum ( whom is either indifferent or repulsed of women and I think 80 , 90 or 95 % gay ) than a woman/female would ever be
NOTE : Please do NOT get the wrong idea ... some gays are good and nice and some gays are bad but what I am saying instead is that the '' inner '' part of gays are all the same ... gays on the inside all have M/M energy and rigidity
This rigidity has caused some * ahem * problems ( like the '' deviations '' I mentioned for example )
How does this all influence sectors of a Patriarchy ? Patriarchy is a system with an emphasis on the male ... since there was a lot of emphasis on the male women were required to be modest and be slightly more conservative in their clothing while males ran around and even had male lovers and required to be strong male males ( aka gayish )
Due to this they needed a system ( marriage ) to create stability and order since well they couldn't just go off being gayish without properly thinking of what to do with 50 % of the population ( the female population )
I tried to get Hindui views of homosexuality and even though some were in favour others were against so I couldn't really pin point something ...
Buddhism I didn't even brush on it but I'll try next time =)
So ...
What do you think ?

Hopefully I'm right on why this creates rigidity in male homosexuality
Overall it was all pretty easy ... I just needed to look at the gay makeup ( M/M )
